|
>>
July 3, 2004
“Primary Education – The Backbone
of a New India” : Address by Mr. Azim Premji at the
12th anniversary celebration of the Returned Non Resident
Indians Association
Honourable Union Ministers Mr. Tytler and
Mr. Rajasekharan, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen,
It is an honour to be with people who have
been successful even outside our own country and yet have
deep roots in India. You have already been playing an important
role in carrying the flag high for our country – wherever
you are and I am certain that you are making the country proud.
India, especially during the past 15 years
has made significant all round progress and the developed
world at large now knows that it can no more be projected
as a country of snake charmers and black magic.
I have no doubts in my mind that India would
soon attend the status of a “developed nation”.
I would like to share with you my perspective
on some of the critical issues that would enable us to be
a “developed nation”.
To begin with, I would like to describe to
you the kind of opportunities that await us as a country.
First, we have world’s largest talent
pool since we account for 1/6th of the world population and
34% of this population consists of people below 15 years.
Projections of the demographic profile by many experts indicate
that especially among the developed countries, by about 2050,
a large proportion – in some cases even as much as 70%
of the population will be of 70 years and above age. It is
in this context that we have the opportunity of building world’s
largest talent pool.
Second, though we have 16% of the world’s
population, our contribution to world’s GDP is just
about 1.6%. The projection of some experts points that the
current wastage of resources including people resources is
upto $ 3 trillion. (Source CK Prahalad presentation). Thus
the gap is huge and we have the opportunity to enhance the
contribution through sustained, high GDP.
Third, our Human Development Index rank is
125 among about 175 countries and hence there is so much opportunity
to improve this index.
My hypothesis is that if have to successfully
exploit the above opportunities, we have to make paradigm
shift in the way we are creating the talent pool in our country.
It requires radical changes in our attitude to the way are
building knowledge. We have to change our current status of
“receiver of knowledge” to “creators of
knowledge” – a status that our country used to
enjoy a few centuries ago.
For this to happen, we have to approach and
re-design education our country differently. It is this area,
where we as Wipro Corporation and in Azim Premji Foundation
we are keen on making a significant contribution. The Wipro
initiative is primarily focussed on education in private institutions
in urban areas and the Azim Premji Foundation initiative is
focussed on rural Government schools where we work in partnership
with the Government.
I think, the way we corporates and private
sector look at development or social sector needs to significantly
change. I hear in most cases, it is viewed as either “corporate
social responsibility” or “social work”
or “giving back to society”. There is an excessive
effort in brand building and decibel levels higher than the
actual impact of the work done. While there is nothing wrong
in brand building, it has to be clearly commensurate with
the impact created.
In both Wipro and at Azim Premji Foundation,
we do not view our work as social work. We look at it as a
professional problem solving approach in a particular domain.
There is a huge problem in terms of quality of education across
the country and we as professionals would like to contribute
to resolving that problem in the most inclusive manner.
We look at it as a life and death issue.
Unless we as a country make significant transformation in
the quality of education a number of other problems such as
poverty, health, underutilisation of human resources, productivity,
our dream of a kind of caring and sharing society will remain
problems for ever.
Within education, we are working on the following
specific issues:
Number 1: The definition of education must
focus on the end product that we desire for a just, humane
and equitable society. Therefore, it must focus on issues
beyond memorizing and cognition. Education must focus on the
all round development of the child that can develop the child
into a thinking, learning, caring, empathizing, healthy and
analytical individual. We are currently in the process of
working with the examination boards to bring about elements
of this focus in the curriculum in more pronounced manner.
Number 2: Assuming we get the kind of definition
of education described above, in order to actualizing the
same, we will need different teaching learning processes,
different culture in the schools and class-room and different
training of teachers becomes necessary. This is where the
child centric, interactive and less threatening environment
is vital.
Number 3: Transformation cannot be achieved
unless the school as a unit and the habitation as a population
group take responsibility of achieving learning inside the
school. Therefore, while the Government financial support
is a must, progressively, we will have to move to locally
managed schools to enhance the relevance of learning in these
schools.
Number 4: The corporates and private sector,
as customers of education, need to play a role that is far
more active and collaborative. They can play this role at
least in three ways. One, they can continuously give a feedback
to the education institutions of their requirements to make
education far more relevant and focussed. Two, they can provide
leadership and managerial help to manage the educational institutions
far more efficiently. And three, they can financially contribute
where possible – for which the Government can announce
incentive programmes.
While working in more than 5000 schools across
several states we have realised that the potential of the
Government schools to impart quality education is no less
than those in private urban schools. Contrary to common belief,
availability of resources and funds is not the key issue.
The key issue is execution and building accountability through
motivation among the key stakeholders.
Under one of our programmes – the Learning
Guarantee Programme, we found that once the schools got an
individual child wise feedback after the evaluation, they
have responded very positively and many of them have committed
to become a learning guarantee school where every child has
the required competencies. I have personally witnessed the
enthusiasm of the head teachers, school committee members
and the students when we felicitated the 40 schools that exhibited
a status of being learning guarantee schools.
Similarly when I visited the schools where
the CD based curricular and co-curricular content developed
by Azim Premji Foundation is being used, I saw and felt the
enthusiasm of the children and of the entire school while
working on the computers. The excitement among the community
members to see their children working on computers was also
palpable.
We do realize that one off interventions may have limitations
in recognising the linkages among various contributing factors
to learning. Therefore, we are currently implementing a holistic
intervention called “Child Friendly School” in
about 1100 rural Government schools in Karnataka and Andhra
Pradesh in partnership with the respective state governments
and UNICEF.
We consciously decided to make the scale
of intervention large since our objective is to evolve “proof
of concept” that has a very high replication and sustenance
potential when implemented in the government system. We are
careful to ensure that we do not add such components that
are not possible in the larger Government system. The idea
is not to create “islands of excellence” but create
a possibility of influencing and transforming a large system.
Apart from building a network of about 20
top class NGOs in Wipro Applying Thought in School and an
organisation of 120 professionals and 1000 paid volunteers
in Azim Premji Foundation our current annual financial commitment
is about $ 6 Mln. This can of course get enhanced progressively
as we increase the scope of our work.
Every time we have discussed the overall
issue of education with various political leaders, senior
bureaucrats and other organisations, there has been an instant
positive response. Everyone recognises the vital role quality
of education can play in building a society and a nation.
The real need is for all of to join hands
and make a concerted effort to make that real impact on the
overall system that will go a long way in making India as
a nation of people who are just, human and hold the values
that are enshrined in our constitution.
I thank the RNRI association for inviting
me here and providing me this opportunity to share my thoughts.
Thank you.
Top
|