|
>>
Building
Human Capital for Economic Development
Keynote
Speech by Mr. Azim Premji, Chairman Wipro Ltd. in The World
Banks Annual Bank Conference on Developmental Economics,
2003
Ladies & Gentlemen.
It is my pleasure to be here with all of you in this Annual
Bank Conference on Development Economics. I thank the World
Bank for this opportunity.
My view is that the world in general and
India in particular are at a very critical phase of development
that has a potential to determine the way things are going
to shape in the next 70 years.
It was Adam Smith who is regarded as father
of Economics who said that the proportion of national produce
must in every nation be regulated by two different circumstances;
first, by the skill, dexterity, and judgment with which its
labour is generally applied; and secondly, by the proportion
between the number of those who are employed in useful labour,
and that of those who are not so employed.
Today, the world is far more developed than
the days of Adam Smith. But the fundamental principles of
economic development have remained the same. The key differentiator
between rich and poor countries remains their ability to unleash
the people power and invest it in the economic activity as
human capital.
The difference in composition of wealth in
these groups of nations clearly brings this out. 75 percent
of national wealth of Western Europe is in the form of its
human resources, 23 percent in the form of industrial produce
and 2 percent in the form of natural resources. For West Africa,
the same percentages are 60, 19 and 21.
Clearly all the economies which have prospered
in the last century have done so due to their ability to tap
the human potential. Economic theories of growth have captured
this idea adequately in the last two decades. Endogenous Growth
Theory developed by Nobel Laureate Robert Lucas and Paul Romer
in late 1980's, often called as "New Growth Theory",
clearly established that, the growth cannot come from the
serendipities of technological innovations. But it is driven
by systematic social choices. These choices primarily include
the investment in technological change and human capital enhancing
activities like education and healthcare. Hence it goes without
saying that if we have to accelerate the economic development
we have to carefully look at these social choices and ensure
that especially the developing societies make progressive
choices.
Human development is about people, about
expanding their choices to lead lives they value. Fundamental
to enlarging human choices is building human capabilities:
the range of things that people can do or be. Human Development
is certainly a broader and primary goal than mere economic
development. That is why we measure development in refined
manner such as Human Development Index instead of mere average
national income. This enables us to include important features
such as longevity and knowledge in the development framework
along with the level of economic well-being.
So the all important question, even more
important than the economic development itself is, whether
human development in a given geography is improving or not?
While there has been clear progress in some areas the frightening
issue is continuing disparity between the developed and underdeveloped
countries. A girl born in Japan today may have a 50 percent
chance of seeing the 22nd century - while a newborn in Afghanistan
has a 1 in 4 chance of dying before age 5. And the richest
5 percent of the world's people have incomes 114 times those
of the poorest 5 percent. In Sub-Saharan Africa human development
has actually regressed in recent years, and the lives of its
very poor people are getting worse. The share of people living
on $1 a day at 47% in early nineties remains the same at the
end of the decade.
Turning to India, the scenario is surely encouraging. We
always believed that India was rich with culture, values and
people power. We have now been acknowledged by the world as
a store house of talent - primarily due to the IT and leadership
talent that India contributed to the world particularly in
the last two decades. The question is how do we build talent
for our overall development?
How do we create a sense of accountability to deliver commitments
to electorate, to customers, to children, to our next generation
and to the normal honest, law abiding citizen of this country?
How do we reach the global standards of excellence in quality,
productivity and efficiency in the shortest possible time
cycle? How do we spread and transfer the best practices of
some of the corporate organisations to public life to reach
every aspect of life?
From our experience in Wipro, we believe that achieving the
above needs meticulous planning, will power, commitment of
the highest offices and consistent pursuance of a people development
approach.
If you consider Wipro is a reasonably successful organisation
and ask me the reasons for this success, without doubt my
answer will be "our people". What did we do to develop
people in a strategic manner?
To start with, as a leader of the organisation I personally
made a commitment way back in 1969 that we would develop leadership
by recruiting people from management campuses. We were among
the first Indian companies to do so. The only thing we were
looking for in the people we recruited was their culture,
values and openness to learn.
Next, when it was not a fashion to speak of beliefs and values,
we evolved our organisation Beliefs in 1972, articulated them
to the rank and file in the organisation and most importantly,
we practised them almost fanatically. We soon found that the
talent we recruited in the organisation immensely enjoyed
working in a value based organisation that stood out and even
made sacrifices for its values.
To nurture the young talent in the organisation, there were
number actions that were necessary. We gave people huge responsibilities
early in life, trusted them fully, allowed them to make mistakes,
promoted an absolutely professional, open and informal work
environment and even compromised on short term results as
long as people exhibited potential to develop. We were the
first organisation in the country to launch Stock Options
as early as in 1983. Our phenomenal growth in sales, profits
and businesses excited people to continue to deliver their
best and developed in them the pride of working with a high
performing organisation. They had to cope with the intellectual
challenges that brought out the best in them. We had to obviously
match the business growth with best of the people practices,
newer approaches to people learning and development and promote
a globally competitive work environment that increased the
propensity of the employees to choose Wipro over others.
My sincere belief is that development and deployment of right
talent in public and private services can soon reach India
to that long awaited status of being a "developed economy".
Both Wipro and Azim Premji Foundation have a single minded
focus in significantly enhancing the quality of learning in
Elementary Schools in India. We are working in partnership
with the Government and our experience has been highly encouraging.
We work with the Government of Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh
bureaucrats and politicians who exhibit maturity and indepth
understanding of the relevant issues in education. The talent
that exists in the Government is enormous and is as competitive
- if not better - as found in corporate organisations.
We however, find an enormous need to develop top class talent
at the grass root level who have world class capability to
deliver the final results. There is also a need to bring out
administrative reforms that promote professional, meritocracy
based people processes that develop the final accountability
towards end user or end customers.
The reason we decided to focus on Elementary Education was
that we felt a sound Elementary Education with high quality
learning could form a solid foundation for development of
India.
Often whenever the discussion on education begins in policy
circles, the focus is on budgetary provisions, the need to
allocate certain percentage of GDP on education. I am not
denying the importance of financial resources in education.
But based on whatever experience we have so far, we have realized
that the key challenge is developing competent teachers and
education functionaries who consider "learning by the
children" as number one priority in their life.
This problem is unlikely to be solved by merely allocating
more money. What it requires is more focussed efforts and
imagination. If we have to make major headways in the area,
we have to stop thinking in terms of better school buildings
and start thinking in terms of passionate, highly motivated
and more importantly, highly competent teachers and head teachers.
We have to think of the economic scenario that awaits us 50
years hence and the kind of talent we require to meet that
scenario successfully. We need to visualize the qualities
and attributes of the person we want at the end of education.
We need to enrich our curriculum to incorporate those attributes
and competencies that are absent in the current curriculum.
We need to evolve assessment and evaluation methods that can
help us identify whether the desired attributes have been
developed. In addition to the assessment oriented evaluation,
we also need development oriented evaluation. We are actively
working with the Government to bring out the concept of providing
"Learning Guarantee" in the schools. If we have
to achieve human development on a continuous basis, what we
need is a continuously learning individual, a continuously
learning nation and a continuously learning world.
Most business people in the world will realise that the material
investments made by them will depreciate over time and will
have to be written off. Only one kind of investment will keep
appreciating irrespective of interest rate in the economy
in all sorts of economic climates -- that is the investment
in human capital.
In India, we have "islands of excellence" in institutions
and corporate organisations have achieved top class standards.
The challenge before us is to develop human capital at the
grass root level deployable in a globalized economy. To develop
people at every level who interface with the common citizens
and deliver the services and products to them.
Investments made in Education and human developments have
cascading, long-term benefits. I remember reading a story
which brought this out in a touching manner.
The story is about a poor Scottish farmer named Fleming.
One day, while trying to make a living for his family, he
heard a cry for help coming from a nearby bog. He dropped
his tools and ran to the bog. There, mired to his waist in
black muck, was a terrified boy, screaming and struggling
to free himself. Farmer Fleming saved the boy from what could
have been a slow and terrifying death. The next day, a fancy
carriage pulled up to the Scotsman's sparse surroundings.
An elegantly dressed nobleman stepped out and introduced himself
as the father of the boy Farmer Fleming had saved.
"I want to repay you, " said the nobleman. "You
saved my son's life." "No, I can't accept payment
for what I did," the Scottish farmer replied, waving
off the offer. At that moment the farmer's own son came to
the door of the hovel.
"Is that your son?" the nobleman asked. "Yes,"
the farmer replied proudly.
"I'll make you a deal. Let me take him and give him
a good education. If he's anything like his father, he'll
grow to a man you can be proud of." And that he did.
In time, Farmer Fleming's son graduated from St. Mary's Hospital
Medical School in London, and went on to become known throughout
the world as the noted Sir Alexander Fleming, the discoverer
of Penicillin. Years afterward, the nobleman's son was stricken
with pneumonia. What saved him?
Penicillin.
This is not the end. The nobleman's son also made a great
contribution to society. For the nobleman was none other than
Lord Randolph Churchill. And his son's name was Winston Churchill.
This is the only way for accelerating economic growth and
development for the entire world economy!
Top
|